SPL[3]

SocioPoli-Logics[3]:

1. Have you ever wondered how a neutral country played its role during wars?
2. Have you ever thought of how an individual can be between two sides disagreements or agreements?

Here is an interesting logic, which can be confusing to some, or can be hard to judge:

Let's assume there are three individuals or countries, [a], [b], and [c]:

Characters:
- [a]: Peaceful, not aggressive and believes in [z]ideology.
- [b]: inflexible, unreliable or eccentric, and believes in nothing or in "[z]or[v]"
- [c] Peaceful, not aggressive and believes in [v]ideology.

Situations:
- [a]&[c]: can be friends or living in peace Although they have different ideologies[v][z].
- [a]&[c]: can be at disagreement or war due to their ideological differences.

- [b] is in between the other two for it doesn't believe in anything specific or nothing at all. Therefore, [b] can be judged as having two characters; one is as a Peace Maker, another as a Hypocrite.

Q:When Can [b] be A hypocrite or A Peace Maker?

1- [b] is judged as Hypocrite when [b] and "[a]or[c]" are at disagreement or war
In summary: Your enemy's friend is your enemy or just a hypocrite.

2- [b] is judged as Peace Maker when [c] and [a] at disagreement or war.
In summary: A friend of two enemies is a peace maker.

3- [b] can rarely be totally neutral when [c]&[a] at war.

Note: [z] and [v] can be ,for example, Capitalism and Communism.

Previous SLP[2]

I hope this is not confusing, plus it's simple.